requestId:684c3e22dccd69.27227527.
Understanding the “Clash between Han and Song” with “distinguishing between the present and the past”: A perspective that assesses “New Learning and Examination”
Author: Pi Mimi (Dynasty of Philosophy, Capital Master Fan)
Source: Author Author Authorized by Confucian Network Published
“Humanities and Chronicles” 2020 Issue 5
Time: Confucius was in the 2570th year of Gengzi, April 14th, Jimao
� In addition to the criticism of Kang’s “distinguishing between the present and the present” and the misreading of Han Dynasty, one of the things that is easy to be neglected is that Kang’s “distinguishing between the present and the present” solves the problem of the “conflicting between the present and the present” in the Qing Dynasty. After Kang Youyu proposed the question of “distinguishing between the present and the present”, he defined Han and Song dynasties from the perspective of the present and the present from the perspective of the present and the present. He not only eliminated the basics of the dispute between Han and Song dynasties in the Qing Dynasty, but also combined Han and Song dynasties from Confucius by defining the origin of Han and Song dynasties from the perspective of the present and the origin of the study. Taking “The Conflict between Han and Song” as a paradise, we understand Kang You’s “distinguish between the present and the past” and understand the meaning of “New Study on the Study of Examination”, we provide a new perspective.
【Keywords】Kang Youhun Late Qing Dynasty Discrimination of the present and ancient times Contact of the Han and Song Study
“New Study on the Examination of the Episode” has always been contested since its publication. Although this book is a test certificate, it is difficult to find out the specific test contents in it. Zhu Yixin pointed out this point in a letter written to Kang Youxi in 1891 [1]. In 1936, Fu Dingyi wrote the “New Student Examination of the Examination of the New Student Examination”, rebuking the thirty-one remarks in the “New Student Examination of the New Student Examination”, and rated the book: “Its citations are extensive, its vocabulary is rampant, its scheming is strong, its scheming is strong, its intention is strong. It is also unreliable, and it is not a pity for his words.”[2] In this regard, many contemporary researchers have begun to understand the writing of this book from Kang Youwei’s political intention, and believe that Kang Youwei wanted to use the skills of academic research to summarize the ancient literature and establish modern literature to facilitate the transformation of the law. [3]
The undeniable denial, the strong tendency of “New Study on Sayings” to respect the present and suppress the ancient times, and there is an internal difference between Kang Youwei’s political viewpoint, but if Kang Youwei only regarded the “distinguish between the present and the past” proposed in this book [4] as the skill of promoting the transformation, it underestimated the academic value and meaning of “New Study on Sayings”. In fact, Kang’s “distinguishing between the present and the past” gave a solution plan to the “Clash of Han and Song” that had been collected in the history of Qing dynasties, which few scholars paid attention to.
Students have pointed out that Kang Youwei was in his early yearsHe had negotiating with Song Xue [5]. Zhu Ciqi, whom he learned from, Zhu Yixin, Chen Shuliang and others who came here were all representative figures of the late Qing Dynasty’s “Jiansong Gathering”. In other words, Song replied helplessly when the Han and Song Dynasty contacted each other. The teachings have become Kang Youwei’s basic academic language in the era. Therefore, this article takes the disadvantages of the late Qing Dynasty, the Song Dynasty, and understands Kang You’s intention and meaning of “distinguishing between the present and the present”.
1. “There is Han Song in the Tao”
In 1896, when Kang Youwei was teaching in Wanmu Caotang in Guangzhou, he pointed out that there were two kinds of conflicts within the current academic system:
There are differences in the Tao that are fighting outside the Tao, and Han Song in the Tao. [6]
One is the battle between different religions and Confucianism, which is the competition between different religions and the other is the battle between Han and Song dynasties. The “Clash of Han and Song dynasties” can be regarded as the “old problem” in the history of academic studies in the Qing Dynasty. Tracing the root of the origin, the excitement of Han studies in the Qing Dynasty was ultimately due to the disadvantages of the Song and Ming dynasties. Due to the lack of learning the nature of Song and Ming dynasties, Yan Wu, in the early Qing Dynasty, advocated “study is science”, analyzed the inter-textual music and music training, and studied the three-generation tribute system, laying the foundation for the basic paradigm of Han in the Qing Dynasty. From Han to Huiqi and Dai Zhen to the extreme, both of them made criticisms of Song Dynasty’s methods of learning and theoretical discussions. During the Jiaqing period, Jiang Fan wrote the “Conferences of the Chinese and Chinese Teachers of the Kingdom”, which described the Qing Dynasty as a continuation of the Han and Chinese learning, and vigorously arranged the Song Dynasty’s academic discipline. In response, Fang Dongshu wrote the “Han and Chinese School Shang” to retaliate. The “Clash between Han and Song” intensified, and the two schools of scholars set up their doors and attacked them. It can be seen that the struggle between Han and Song dynasties was the theme of the Qing Dynasty’s academic history.
However, when Zhikang was about to be together, the “Clash of Han and Song” was no longer a new problem, but did he mention the “Clash of Han and Song” to the same height as the different religions, and what is wrong? Kang Youwei had this kind of commentary in his 1893 scientific trial [7]:
The sages guard against the disadvantages of Confucianism and worry about the harm of the strange religion. The disadvantages of Confucianism are that learning and thinking are not combined. The harm of the odd and extreme is caused by attack. The Master prevented it. Moreover, the Confucians in ancient times all predicted that the system of the Great Way was not in the subject of the Six Arts, so there was no danger of confucianism, and it was impossible to learn. Later Confucianism was subtle and had different teachings, so the study of study of theory and theory was contended in the Tao, while the study of the nine-level learning was different from the Tao. The problem of examining and interfering with logic is vast but not important, and the problem is rude and difficult to be safe. If you are happy all over the world, your love will harm your kindness and will harm your own will. Alas! The hundreds of schools of thought went back and forth, and the learning that the ancestors and sages, which were purely prepared by the original master and the last, became a nationwide schizophrenic. [8]
In this trial, Kang Youqiu linked the “Clash of Han and Song” with the harm of alien religions. First of all, Kang You pointed out that for Confucianism, the threat of heterodox learning should be the most vigilant.In “The Book of Thoughts”, Confucius said that “attacking is not the same as the standard of the Song Wei-shou, but it is not very consistent with the standards of Song Wei-shou.” He Yan’s notes say: “attacking is to govern. Good ways have their own rules, so they are different and different. The differences are different.” Xing Bing’s memorial said: “This chapter prohibits people from learning from the indiscriminate learning. Attacking is to govern. The differences are to describe the books of the hundreds of schools. If a person does not learn the correct good ways and treats the books of the strange ways, this will be the deepest harm. href=”https://twsugarlover.org/”>Baowoman. Because his good deeds are solid, they are different and the same. The differences are different. “[9] It can be seen that when Confucius was aware of the strange learning of the hundreds of schools, and in the subsequent development of Confucianism, major scholars such as Dong Zhongshu and others also deeply understood this principle, which led to the fact that Emperor Hanwu had defeated the hundreds of schools. Secondly, Kang You pointed out that the most fundamental reason why the evils occur is whether Confucianism can maintain consistency and completeness. If Confucianism can maintain a complete academic system, it can resist the harm of strange things without worrying about it being misleading. If there are serious disputes and conflicts within Confucianism and cannot form a unified theoretical whole, then the learning of strange things will have the opportunity to take advantage of them. Therefore, when the Confucianism in Baocai Network was compare
發佈留言