requestId:68753bf107efb6.42475890.
From “I heard it together” to “knowing it by hearing it”——About Mencius’ philosophy href=”https://twsugarblog.org/”>Integrate software“Speaking”
Author: Wu Long (Shanghai Teachers’ College of Philosophy and Law and Politics)
Source: “History of Chinese Philosophy” 2023 Issue 6
Abstract: Stay in ordinary experiencing “listening”, Mencius believed that individuals have a tendency to “listen” in “listen”, and coordinate their preference for certain “listen”, and individuals can cultivate their own virtues through “listen”. “Speaking” is also related to national management, and hearing the opinions of all parties has become the main condition for making correct decisions. During this process, the monarch recognized some preferences in “hearding”, emotional discrimination and positive hearing of valuable opinions, which made him continue to move towards the Holy King. From “listening” to “listening”, “listening” appears as an advanced “listening” in some of Mencius’s expressions, which is related to politics, gifts and behaviors. This not only highlights the influence of “hearing”, but also ultimately implements “knowing by hearing”. This prompts individuals to become saints in the process of “listening”. The above commentary and multiple connotations of “listening”, such as ethics, political philosophy and practical philosophy, show the rich philosophical meaning of “listening” in Mencius’ philosophy.
Mencius valued the meaning and value of “hearing”. The statement about “hearing” in “Mencius” is about personal self-cultivation and political management. You can understand both the “hearing” in the meaning of cognition, and the “hearing” and “hearing” in political practice. From the perspective of personal self-cultivation, “hearing” exerts the main effect in the process of forming a fantasy personality. From the perspective of political management, “hearing” helps political decision makers slowly move towards the “saint king”. This also proves that the relationship between “hearing” and “holy” (Sanctuary).
1. When the ears are heard, there is a similar hearing
From the ordinary meaning, “speaking” first shows an experienced listening behavior. During the process of “listening”, the subject shows a certain commonality in terms of content love and choice. The book “Mencius” records: “Whether the king wants to be heard?” The king smiled but did not say anything. Said: “I will ask for the “https://sites.google.com/view/sugardaddy-story-share”>彩彩彩 and the discussion. href=”https://twilovedating999.com/”>Fill a monthly price. Participants – The winner is short of speech and heat, lacks body and body. Suppresses because of color, lack of visual and eye and sound, lack of hearing and ears, and lack of orders in front of the king and the king’s ministers, and is the king’s right?” said: “No,”. I am not doing this. “(Mencius: King Hui of Liang”)
Mencius saw King Qixuan and asked him what he wanted to realize what he wanted to realize. What was the fantasy and embrace that he wanted to realize? The king smiled but said nothing. In this case, Mencius said a passage, which was to measure it from the aspects of taste, coldness, vision, hearing, and Ayu Ayu’s words. In this way, he touched “hearing”, that is, “the sound lacked hearing in the ears and?” The order from the original meaning seemed to be an objective question Baobao.com: “Is it for the sake of beautiful music not to listen to? ”【1】But if it is evaluated in the entire language, it is not difficult to see that the taste, touch, vision, etc. that are touched here all have a certain meaning. That is, this kind of “hearing” is only “hearing” that meets the natural desire. In “hearing”, it is related to the natural nature of the individual, and thus there is the ability to expose one’s “hearing” self. From this, the sounds heard can also be the sound of Pu Shang similar to “Zheng sound”. These In meaning, it can be seen from the later contrast with “convenience”.
From this understanding of the reflexive “sound lacks hearing”, the “hearing” touched is a common experience listening. But what is different from ordinary “hearing” is that this specifically presents a playback “hearing” that focuses on the natural side. Therefore, the meaning here can be understood as: it is difficult to say that such sounds are still lacking. Is it satisfying your desire to “listen”? In addition, the “sound” here is not only a sound in popular meaning, but it specifically shows a “sound” that is not in line with the norms of the gifted servant. “Speaking” like “listen” in the ground is obviously different from the gift.
Understanding this sentence from the specific context is naturally Mencius’s reason for wanting to get. “Mencius knew the king’s intentions and asked for it, so he tried it. ”【2】. But when we settled in the above analysis, we will evaluate the “hearing” and “Bringing the Internet Motors and MotorsSpeaking”, it is not difficult to find that Mencius reminded the monarch from the back to “hearing” to suppress his desire, and the period itself listens to “sound”. In other words, the monarch should be “hearing” on the level of “hearing” and actually suppresses this by “hearing”. Only by the behavior of certain differences and gifts can we better practice “hearing”, correctly welcome “hearing”, and from the natural nature of the “hearing” regulations itself, it prompts them to constantly correct social nature. Only in this way can we be called a monarch with virtue. At the same time, it also demonstrates the influence of “hearing” in the process of shaping virtues and becoming a sanctification.
From peopleThe natural development of the body, the individual’s speech of “sound” in the listening desire, or some preference for “sound”, is a certain coordination tendency in humanity. In other words, everyone likes good listening words and prefers good music. No one can receive “loyal words” naturally and happily from the beginning. Even a saint who hears “good words” and can “worship” (Mencius: Gongsun Chou”) is also a virtue that perfects itself in the process of “listening” and suppresses natural desire to see it. This is to say that in terms of nature, it is not difficult to make a sound of “sound” in the “listening” practice, which is the mutual communication between listeners in “listening”. “Therefore, it is said: the mouth is similar to the taste, and the ears are the same as the sound; the eyes are the same as the color, and the eyes are the same as the beauty.” (Mencius: Gaozi 1) Mencius believed that the same love is the same as the mouth is the same as the taste, and the ears are the same as the sound. Developed from the naturalness of the listening layer, this means that the ears like beautiful music and the content that hears ears and ears. There are at most the following points worth paying attention to in this explanation.
First of all, “sound” as the object of “sound” does not only refer to ordinary sounds here. In other words, the so-called “similar listening” here does not only represent the ordinary suction that individuals hear and listen to the guest’s voice. If not, the union in the original text will not be true, because the taste is “old” and the view is “beauty”. Therefore, the “sound” that “hears” here should also be a beautiful sound, or any content that is widely used in the ears. Therefore, the above statement shows that the listener’s pursuit of beautiful sounds is the same, which is like a food that tastes sweet and sweet, and a thing that has a beautiful feeling.
But it is undeniable that individuals pursue beautiful sounds and need to stand on the basis of sound. As an act with subjective intention, “speaking” is affected by subjective preferences during the auditor’s behavior, there is still something in common about the absorption of the sounds he heard and the judgment, that is, people will dispel noisy music, and they all express their love for harmonious and beautiful music. This brings us to the second point worth paying attention to: the “similarity” here can not only understand “similarity”, but also understand “connection” and “cooperation”.
The so-called “connection” is to explain that in the matter of “hearing”, people’s hearing is consistent, that is, the sound heard is difficult to have subjective views after entering the process of human recognition, but it cannot deny its objec TC:
發佈留言